03/12/1986 - Hazard evaluation requirements under the Hazard Communication standard

	The Home page of ILPI's Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Resource, the leader in SDS information since 1995!
	The history and philosophy behind this resource.
	A curated collection of books and reference materials concerning Safety Data Sheets and closely related topics.
	Paste your plain text SDS into the SDS-Demystifier, and it will be converted into a hypertext-enriched document with links to detailed explanations of each key term.
	An extensive list of frequently asked questions about Safety Data Sheets including regulations, content, compliance, and more.
	A humorous take on Safety Data Sheet jargon. Fill in the blanks on our entry form to generate a personalized Unsafety Data Sheet to share with your coworkers.
	Since 1995, we've maintained this massive curated list of the best places to find Safety Data Sheets on the Internet.
	Way more than a glossary, this hypertext-enhanced resource covers hundreds of SDS-related terms and expert knowledge. Each entry includes both the SDS relevance and links to additional authoritative resources.
	Archived results of Safety Data Sheet related polls taken by some of our millions of site visitors
	You are here! The OSHA regulations behind SDS regulations, including the inspection guidelines and over 400 official interpretations letters under the Hazard Communication Standard
	Commercial suppliers of SDS authoring and management software as well as cloud compliance services.
	Commercial companies that will create SDS's for your specific needs as well as SDS translation companies.

This letter is in reference to our previous telephone conversation on March 12 regarding hazard evaluation.

Hazard evaluation is a process which relies heavily on the professional judgment of the evaluator. Employers evaluating chemicals shall describe in writing the procedures they used to determine the hazards of the chemical they evaluate. If a determination has been made that a hazard does not exist, then the labeling and material safety data sheet requirements will not apply.

Thank you for your letter dated January 28 in regards to the Hazard Communication Standard. Please accept my apology for the delay in response. The overwhelming number of letters and telephone calls regarding the Hazard Communication Standard has caused unavoidable delays in responding to the public's concerns.

Methylene chloride has been shown through established scientific studies to be a suspect carcinogen. However, since the chemical is not listed as a carcinogen by IARC or the NTP, labeling is not listed as a carcinogen by IARC or the NTP, labeling requirements are not necessary.

If we may be of further assistance on this matter please feel free to contact our office at (202)523-8036.

Mr. Dave Smith
Director, Office of Health
Compliance Assistance
USDOL-OSHA
200 Constitution Avenue
Washington D.C. 20210

We currently manufacture a typewriter/printer ribbon that uses methylene chloride in one of the manufacturing processes. Because of the nature of the process, a small amount of residual methylene chloride remains in the ribbon as it is shipped to customers. Currently, the level of methylene chloride in each ribbon is less than 0.1% by weight.

In order to make our manufacturing process more efficient, we are contemplating a change that would raise the residual methylene chloride to a maximum of 0.5% by weight. Extensive airborne monitoring has been performed on typewriters and printers using ribbons with 0.5% to 1% residual methylene chloride. Even under the most extraordinary operating conditions, the highest level of methylene chloride measured at or around the machine is only 0.12 PPM. This is over 4000 times below the current OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 500 PPM. Although there have been conflicting studies about the carcinogenicity of methylene chloride, neither IARC nor the latest NTP Annual Report list it as a carcinogen. Since the ribbon is enclosed in a cassette cartridge, this eliminates the need for dermal contact during normal use. Using any of the available exposure criteria for this solvent, we have concluded that there is no inhalation or dermal hazard associated with this ribbon.

In light of the requirements of 29CFR1910.1200, we would like to market this ribbon with a maximum of 0.5% residual methylene chloride without a warning label or Material Safety Data Sheet. We would appreciate your review of our conclusion to ensure that it meets the intent of the Hazard Communication Standard. I would appreciate a written response to this inquiry. If you have any additional questions, please call me at (606) 232-2839.

Title: 03/12/1986 - Hazard evaluation requirements under the Hazard Communication standard.
Record Type: Interpretation	Standard Number: 1910.1200

Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated