Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 10:57:23 -0800
Reply-To: neal**At_Symbol_Here**chemical-safety.com
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Neal Langerman <neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM>
Organization: ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY
Subject: Re: Chemical Safety headlines from Google
In-Reply-To: <4D2445F1.8648.0091.0**At_Symbol_Here**ph.lacounty.gov>
Having been somewhat close to this affair, I wondered at the time the
Defense asked for a TRO to prevent the burn who he could have retained
to
enter the structure and search for "evidence"
Will be interesting to see how Bonnie DuManis - SD County DA - handles
this.
nl
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
--------
The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential
and
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
=A0
ACSafety has a new address:
NEAL LANGERMAN
ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY, Inc.
PO Box 152329
SAN DIEGO CA 92195
011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)
www.chemical-safety.com
We no longer support FAX.
Please contact me before sending any packages or courier delivery. The
address for those items is:
5340 Caminito Cachorro
San Diego CA 92105
-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of
Eric Clark
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 10:18 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google
There were a few notably obvious and bizarre statements made in the
article.
http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sdcounty/article_7c9032a1-d35a-5901-b44
2-b
715ab5991cc.html
quoted below:
He added that McKinley's statement about his clients' distress and
inconvenience probably wouldn't sway the county.
"I think the key is, it's a difficult situation," Bunton said.
"Sometimes
individuals have to suffer to protect the greater good. And that may be
the
case here."
>>> "Debbie M. Decker" 1/5/2011 9:26 AM >>>
How did I know this would happen? I wonder if he'll get
anything........
:)
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google
===
EXCLUSIVE: Attorney for 'bomb house' owner files claim against county
An attorney for the owners of the "bomb house" property near Escondido
has
demanded at least $500,000 for his clients' loss and distress, according
to
a claim filed with San Diego County.
In a dramatic operation that captured national attention, authorities
burned
the single-story residence to the ground on Dec. 9, 2010, to destroy
what
they said was its huge and highly unstable stockpile of explosives.
They said fire was the only safe way to neutralize the homemade bomb
materials found throughout the cluttered house just west of Interstate
15
and north of El Norte Parkway. Authorities said the explosives included
the
same destructive compounds as those used in recent terrorist plots.
us_ca home explosives followup
===
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post