Interactive Learning Paradigms, Incorporated


The Home page of ILPI's Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Resource, the leader in SDS information since 1995!
The history and philosophy behind this resource.
A curated collection of books and reference materials concerning Safety Data Sheets and closely related topics.
Paste your plain text SDS into the SDS-Demystifier, and it will be converted into a hypertext-enriched document with links to detailed explanations of each key term.
An extensive list of frequently asked questions about Safety Data Sheets including regulations, content, compliance, and more.
A humorous take on Safety Data Sheet jargon. Fill in the blanks on our entry form to generate a personalized Unsafety Data Sheet to share with your coworkers.
Since 1995, we've maintained this massive curated list of the best places to find Safety Data Sheets on the Internet.
Way more than a glossary, this hypertext-enhanced resource covers hundreds of SDS-related terms and expert knowledge. Each entry includes both the SDS relevance and links to additional authoritative resources.
Archived results of Safety Data Sheet related polls taken by some of our millions of site visitors
You are here! The OSHA regulations behind SDS regulations, including the inspection guidelines and over 400 official interpretations letters under the Hazard Communication Standard
Commercial suppliers of SDS authoring and management software as well as cloud compliance services.
Commercial companies that will create SDS's for your specific needs as well as SDS translation companies.
Safety Emporium has thousands of OSHA safety signs and more

Safety signs, banners, and scoreboards? Get yours at Safety Emporium!

OSHA Hazard Communication Letters of Interpretation

Hazard determination; labeling of solid materials.

Issued
Record type
Interpretation
Historical standard
HCS 1994, pre-GHS archive
Current standard
HCS 2024, as amended

ILPI assessment: Article and solid-label exceptions remain conditional; modern classification applies

This letter addresses the obsolete 1994 version of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS). Its distinction between an exempt article and a nonexempt solid material remains useful. Lack of a release during shipment does not establish article status when normal use involves grinding or other hazardous releases.

Apply all conditions of complete article definition (FAQ), anticipated-use evaluation, mixture classification and current solid-material label exception(formerly(f)(2)). The few-molecules description must not be separated from the no-physical-hazard-or-health-risk condition. No mandatory new testing does not mean no evidence evaluation; testing a mixture as a whole is not a universal substitute for all modern hazard-specific criteria. See dust and classification.

Last reviewed: .

Related interpretations
About this ILPI assessment

This comparison with current requirements is not a finding that OSHA has formally withdrawn this letter. This assessment reflects editorial judgment informed by human review and AI assistance. It is an opinion, may contain errors or omissions, and is not an official OSHA determination. For guidance on how OSHA requirements apply to your circumstances, contact your local OSHA office.

OSHA's notice about interpretation letters

The following notice is published on OSHA's interpretation pages; it is general guidance, not a letter-specific withdrawal notice.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

Source: OSHA's original letter page.


December 1, 1998

Mr. J. J. Wherry
Grinding Wheel Institute
30200 Detroit Road
Cleveland, Ohio 44145-1967

Dear Mr. Wherry:

NoTrax Interlocking Drainage Mat for Eyewash and Safety Shower Stations

Delineate your eye wash and safety shower locations with floor marking solutions from Safety Emporium.

We have received your letter of August 6, addressed to Mr. John B. Miles Jr., Director, Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's) Directorate of Compliance Programs (DCP), in which you asked questions regarding labeling under the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), 29 CFR 1910.1200 [ILPI: Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS]. Thank you for your inquiry. For clarity, your questions are paraphrased below.

  1. What tests or exposure scenarios are required to establish a standard of proof for the article exemption?
  2. The HCS does not require testing to determine the presence of a hazardous chemical. The rule covers chemicals which are "known to be present." The release of a very small quantity (that is, a few molecules or trace amounts) of a hazardous chemical is not covered by the rule. For instance, one may assume that an item, such as newly varnished furniture, emits chemicals. This, however, would not be covered under the HCS.

    [ILPI note: At issuance: HCS 1994, pre-GHS archive. The complete article definition also requires no physical hazard or health risk under normal use. Evaluate anticipated grinding/sanding releases; the nonexempt solid-material labeling provision is now (f)(4).]

    This definition of the article exemption has not changed since the standard was originally published in 1983. In 1994, the definition was amended to provide clarification. Further guidance is provided on page 31865 of the Federal Register, Volume 52, Number 163, published on Monday, August 24, 1987.

  3. When testing "as a whole" for hazard determination, what are the full range of tests required to establish the presence or absence of a hazard?
  4. There is no pre-set list of testing requirements. Manufacturers may test a mixture "as a whole" or may rely on tests which have been scientifically conducted. The purpose of the hazard determination is to provide known information for the elements listed under paragraph (g) of the standard [ILPI: Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS]. It is the manufacturer's prerogative to "test as a whole" for any or none of these elements.

  5. Grinding wheels, superabrasive products, and sandpaper do not create an exposure during shipment. Are these items subject to labeling provisions under paragraph (f)(1) [ILPI: Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS; modern shipped-label elements apply] or paragraph (f)(2) [ILPI: Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS; solid-material exception now (f)(4)] of the standard?
  6. Labeling requirements for items which are solid materials, but do not classify as articles, are described in paragraph (f)(2) of the standard [ILPI: Original HCS 1994 context · Current HCS; solid-material exception now (f)(4)].

We hope that this information is helpful. Please feel free to contact OSHA's Office of Health Compliance Assistance at (202) 693-2190 if further guidance is needed.

Sincerely,

Richard E. Fairfax
Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs


The original official public domain version of this document is available from OSHA at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1998-12-01.