Aug 31, 1993 - Employee exposure to hazardous chemicals while working around small sensors.Aug 31, 1993 - Employee exposure…working around small sensors.
The Home page of ILPI's Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Resource, the leader in SDS information since 1995!
The history and philosophy behind this resource.
A curated collection of books and reference materials concerning Safety Data Sheets and closely related topics.
Paste your plain text SDS into the SDS-Demystifier, and it will be converted into a hypertext-enriched document with links to detailed explanations of each key term.
An extensive list of frequently asked questions about Safety Data Sheets including regulations, content, compliance, and more.
A humorous take on Safety Data Sheet jargon. Fill in the blanks on our entry form to generate a personalized Unsafety Data Sheet to share with your coworkers.
Since 1995, we've maintained this massive curated list of the best places to find Safety Data Sheets on the Internet.
Way more than a glossary, this hypertext-enhanced resource covers hundreds of SDS-related terms and expert knowledge. Each entry includes both the SDS relevance and links to additional authoritative resources.
Archived results of Safety Data Sheet related polls taken by some of our millions of site visitors
You are here! The OSHA regulations behind SDS regulations, including the inspection guidelines and over 400 official interpretations letters under the Hazard Communication Standard
Commercial suppliers of SDS authoring and management software as well as cloud compliance services.
Commercial companies that will create SDS's for your specific needs as well as SDS translation companies.
Safety signs, banners, and scoreboards? Get yours at Safety Emporium!
OSHA Hazard Communication Letters of Interpretation
Employee exposure to hazardous chemicals while working around small sensors.
ILPI assessment: Exposure during construction, removal or disposal remains important
This letter addresses the obsolete 1987 version of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS). Its central HazCom conclusion remains useful: a sealed sensor's ordinary use and work that opens, damages or removes it can present different exposure situations. A small amount or an enclosed chemical does not automatically establish an article exemption.
This comparison with current requirements is not a finding that OSHA has formally withdrawn this letter. This assessment reflects editorial judgment informed by human review and AI assistance. It is an opinion, may contain errors or omissions, and is not an official OSHA determination. For guidance on how OSHA requirements apply to your circumstances, contact your local OSHA office.
OSHA's notice about interpretation letters
The following notice is published on OSHA's interpretation pages; it is general guidance, not a letter-specific withdrawal notice.
OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.
This is in response to your letter of June 21, to Mr. John Miles concerning the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200 [ILPI:Original HCS 1987 context (PDF) · Current HCS]. Mr. Miles forwarded your inquiry to the Office of Health Compliance Assistance for response. Please accept our apologies for the delay in responding to your letter.
You explain that employees working with or around small sensors which contain small amounts of a corrosive chemical would not be exposed to the hazardouschemicals under "normal conditions of use." OSHA agrees that these sensors would be considered articles as long as employees were not exposed to the hazardous chemicals, and, therefore, would not be covered by the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS).
If employees were exposed to the hazardouschemicals contained in the sensors during the construction of scientific instruments, or during the removal and disposal of old sensors, the HCS [ILPI:Original HCS 1987 context (PDF) · Current HCS] would apply. It is the employer's responsibility to determine if there is a threat of exposure to hazardous chemicals. OSHA instruction CPL 2-2.38C ILPI note: Original: CPL 2-2.38C (1990). Current: HCS inspection guidance., dated October 22 1990, states the following in paragraph K.3.c.:
In some cases, a hazardouschemical may be present for a long period of time without an employee exposure until repair or demolition activities are performed. By way of example, employers involved in work operations where jackhammers are being used to break up a sidewalk know that they are exposing their employees to a hazardouschemical (silica), even though they did not "bring" the hazard to the site. Even though other provisions of the standard may not be enforceable (MSDS and labels), the employer should still develop a hazard communication program to inform their employees "about the hazardouschemicals to which they are exposed." Employers may utilize their already existing hazard communication program to communicate information on these types of hazards to their employees, as per paragraph (e)(3) [ILPI:Original HCS 1987 context (PDF) · Current HCS].
If there is potential for employee exposure, employers are required to include information regarding the hazards of the corrosive materials in the sensors in their hazard communication program.
We hope this information is helpful. If you have any further questions please contact the Office of Health Compliance Assistance at (202) 219-8036.
Sincerely,
Roger A. Clark, Director Directorate of Compliance Programs