From: Dr Bob <drbob**At_Symbol_Here**FLOWSCIENCES.COM>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Fume Hood Alarm Set Points
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 23:36:08 +0000
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU>
Message-ID: MWHPR07MB28324FFD153A606AAC263785D91C0**At_Symbol_Here**MWHPR07MB2832.namprd07.prod.outlook.com
In-Reply-To


Hello Debra!


Many better hoods can be set at 18 inches and 80 fpm. Below this face velocity, bad things can begin to happen. Remember that at around 5 air changes per minute or lower, corrosion and explosions become much more likely.

I'll send more stuff from work in AM! 

Bob Haugen


Sent from my Samsung Galaxy , an AT&T LTE smartphone



-------- Original message --------
From: Debra M Decker <00001204b93f9a5e-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Date: 10/21/20 6:47 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**Princeton.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Fume Hood Alarm Set Points

To tag off Ralph's list, I'd also want to know if hood sashes are horizontal sliding or vertical rising or combination sashes.

Debbie

On Oct 21, 2020 11:31 AM, Jordan Sumliner <0000139f25c2a3e1-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> wrote:

Good Afternoon,

 

Our chemical hygiene plan as well as other resources indicates the average face velocity should be between 80-120 LFM when sash is at 18 inches, and we do train users to check the local air flow monitor before use. If the monitor shows an air flow outside that range, we would not want users to use the chemical fume hood (exceptions are for equipment setup) and to report it. 

 

In addition, we are updating our alarm set points at a local (the end user is alerted) and at a system level (meaning EHS and facilities are alerted) for a higher level of control over these critical engineering controls. 

 

I would like to get opinions on what you have local air flow monitors set to alarm at (high and low), if you differentiate at a system level and any considerations to make. We do not have occupancy sensors on our hoods, but some are setup to adjust a damper when there is a drop in air flow. The other are constant volume with no adjustments possible with dampers . 

 

Thanks,

 

Jordan Sumliner

Associate Environmental, Health, Safety and Sustainability Specialist

Environmental, Health, Safety and Sustainability

 

GSK

14200 Shady Grove Road, Rockville, MD 20850

Email   jordan.x.sumliner**At_Symbol_Here**gsk.com

 

GSK monitors email communications sent to and from GSK in order to protect GSK, our employees, customers, suppliers and business partners, from cyber threats and loss of GSK Information. GSK monitoring is conducted with appropriate confidentiality controls and in accordance with local laws and after appropriate consultation.

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas


On Oct 21, 2020 11:31 AM, Jordan Sumliner <0000139f25c2a3e1-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> wrote:

Good Afternoon,

 

Our chemical hygiene plan as well as other resources indicates the average face velocity should be between 80-120 LFM when sash is at 18 inches, and we do train users to check the local air flow monitor before use. If the monitor shows an air flow outside that range, we would not want users to use the chemical fume hood (exceptions are for equipment setup) and to report it. 

 

In addition, we are updating our alarm set points at a local (the end user is alerted) and at a system level (meaning EHS and facilities are alerted) for a higher level of control over these critical engineering controls. 

 

I would like to get opinions on what you have local air flow monitors set to alarm at (high and low), if you differentiate at a system level and any considerations to make. We do not have occupancy sensors on our hoods, but some are setup to adjust a damper when there is a drop in air flow. The other are constant volume with no adjustments possible with dampers . 

 

Thanks,

 

Jordan Sumliner

Associate Environmental, Health, Safety and Sustainability Specialist

Environmental, Health, Safety and Sustainability

 

GSK

14200 Shady Grove Road, Rockville, MD 20850

Email   jordan.x.sumliner**At_Symbol_Here**gsk.com

 

GSK monitors email communications sent to and from GSK in order to protect GSK, our employees, customers, suppliers and business partners, from cyber threats and loss of GSK Information. GSK monitoring is conducted with appropriate confidentiality controls and in accordance with local laws and after appropriate consultation.

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas


On Oct 21, 2020 11:31 AM, Jordan Sumliner <0000139f25c2a3e1-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> wrote:

Good Afternoon,

 

Our chemical hygiene plan as well as other resources indicates the average face velocity should be between 80-120 LFM when sash is at 18 inches, and we do train users to check the local air flow monitor before use. If the monitor shows an air flow outside that range, we would not want users to use the chemical fume hood (exceptions are for equipment setup) and to report it. 

 

In addition, we are updating our alarm set points at a local (the end user is alerted) and at a system level (meaning EHS and facilities are alerted) for a higher level of control over these critical engineering controls. 

 

I would like to get opinions on what you have local air flow monitors set to alarm at (high and low), if you differentiate at a system level and any considerations to make. We do not have occupancy sensors on our hoods, but some are setup to adjust a damper when there is a drop in air flow. The other are constant volume with no adjustments possible with dampers . 

 

Thanks,

 

Jordan Sumliner

Associate Environmental, Health, Safety and Sustainability Specialist

Environmental, Health, Safety and Sustainability

 

GSK

14200 Shady Grove Road, Rockville, MD 20850

Email   jordan.x.sumliner**At_Symbol_Here**gsk.com

 

GSK monitors email communications sent to and from GSK in order to protect GSK, our employees, customers, suppliers and business partners, from cyber threats and loss of GSK Information. GSK monitoring is conducted with appropriate confidentiality controls and in accordance with local laws and after appropriate consultation.

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.