From: TILAK CHANDRA <0000058f112ac338-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Academic freedom?
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 19:32:58 +0000
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: DM5PR0601MB37841ED4E0B2E53CB9BFEB2988B20**At_Symbol_Here**DM5PR0601MB3784.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
In-Reply-To


Very good comments by Pete here!

 

I am not certain why the school stopped this type of research; however under certain condition compounds containing of fluorine can become explosive/unstable. Fluorination reactions require special infrastructure and equipment to handle the toxic chemicals such as fluorine, SF4 and hydrogen fluoride.  Currently, there are numerous safer reagents and technologies available in the market for fluorination at plant-scale.  Polymerization reactions may perhaps need the pure fluorine gas.

 

Fluorine chemistry is very fascinating, there are many drugs used in the market containing fluorinated moieties such as Lipitor and Prozac. It is unfortunate that the professor needs to stop his research involving the fluorine chemistry.

 

Tilak



From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> on behalf of Reinhardt, Peter <peter.reinhardt**At_Symbol_Here**YALE.EDU>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2018 2:39:39 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Academic freedom?
 

I think that nearly all EHS professionals greatly prefer to be partners with researchers, to help researchers in their work. While the loss of important fluorine research is unfortunate, it appears that the lab/PI in the article is the exception. In this case, my reading is that EHS did the proper thing--to raise the "incidents" and substandard conditions to university leadership's attention, to conduct a safety review, and to bring in outside experts to evaluate the cost of brining the lab up to standards. As I read this article, it was the university leadership's decision to close the lab, not their Office of Research Safety. Hard choices sometimes need to be made, and I am proud that Clemson made a decision on the side of safety. 


Proper PPE for handling N2 is not costly, so I must wonder if the PI truly makes safety a priority. I also wonder if the PI had requested standard safeguards (i.e., the necessary $1 million in safety upgrades) from the university or in his grants. 


Again, this really appears to be the exception. Exceptions happen. EHS professionals are expected to act when they find such safety problems. As a result, partnerships may end and (unsafe) research may be impeded. And it really has nothing to do with academic freedom.


Pete Reinhardt, Yale EHS



From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> on behalf of Lawrence Tirri <larry.tirri**At_Symbol_Here**UNLV.EDU>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2018 1:56 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Academic freedom?
 
Neal,  I agree completely with how you describe the role of safety staff. Before retirement, when I was leading the safety department, my team established a collaborative relationship with academic and research faculty. The question we asked was how we could help them work safely with the materials and equipment they needed to use.  We viewed this as our responsibility, and to help both the academic and research faculty develop their understanding that they too had the responsibility to work safely and to mentor their students to work safely as well by setting the example.   

Larry Tirri, Emeritus
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry 
UNLV


Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 29, 2018, at 4:17 PM, NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**CHEMICAL-SAFETY.COM> wrote:

Paul:

You have brought this discussion full circle back to about 2-3 years ago. The message I tried to get across then and still repeat whenever given the opportunity: "The job of the safety professional is to help the research occur safely; never to impede progress."

 

Yes, there are times we need to say "slow down"; but our job is to figure out how the work can proceed.  While my academic roots were in the soil of the funding-starved PI, I recognize there are others much more qualified to evaluate the quality of most current research.

 

I hope 2019 continues the trend of graduate students pulling their mentors to include safety as part of their education.  The graduate-student centric Joint Safety Committees are a powerful mechanism.  I am pleased ACS/CHAS are working so hard to grow this concept.

 

nl

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Safety is the practice of fixed and unbendable principles, the first of which is to be flexible at all times. Paraphrase of Everett Dirksen.

The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

 

ACSafety has a new address:

NEAL LANGERMAN, Ph.D.

ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY, Inc.

PO Box 152329

SAN DIEGO CA 92195

011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)

www.chemical-safety.com

 

We no longer support FAX.

 

 Please contact me before sending any packages or courier delivery.  The address for those items is:

5340 Caminito Cachorro

San Diego CA 92105

 

 

From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU> On Behalf Of Harrison, Paul
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 1:15 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Academic freedom?

 

Hello all: while I continue to respect the members of this discussion list and the work they do, I do feel this particular thread has gone rather off track, and taken on a somewhat anti-academic theme that seems inappropriate to me.

My own interpretation of academic freedom at its most fundamental (and there may be other aspects) is that it covers the right to perform research in areas of one's own choice; this is in stark contrast to the industrial case, made earlier in this thread, where an "employee" of a company may well be compelled by an "employer" to move field, in line with the company's objectives (usually money).  The academic freedom concept is a hard-fought-for principle that should not be dismissed lightly, for example solely by safety arguments that say the work cannot be done.

That said, this "right" to work in the area that fascinates us academics has limits: first, of course, money raises its ugly head, and one has to convince grant panels and so forth that the work is worth funding.  Presumably the work in fluorine chemistry that has raised this matter has already been judged to have met that standard, and I am not convinced that it is up to the safety community to judge the work again.

Safety poses a similar challenge in the context of academic freedom, in the sense that it should not be used to ride roughshod over the fundamental right to do the work, yet still is an absolute requirement of it.  As such, I see the role of the safety professional as working with the academic to facilitate the work being conducted in a safe manner.  If the work has been judged worthy of funding, then the budget should include all the funds necessary for the safety program to perform the work (beyond whatever the institution might agree to provide).  I rather doubt that there are many projects which it would not be possible, in principle at least, to perform safely.

I will say that I can imagine that it can be frustrating for safety professionals to work with academics who oppose them at every move.  However, it may be helpful to recognize that the academic may well be an expert in the specific materials and the nature of the risks associated with them (e.g. fluorine), while the safety professional is more of an expert in assessment of those risks.  I have found that a collegial approach has been more productive in the long run, and I say this both as an academic and from many years working on and with our safety committees.

Anyhow, my 5 cents' worth... 

Paul Harrison, B.A. Hons. (Oxon), Ph.D.

Associate Professor and Associate Chair (Undergraduate)

Chemistry & Chemical Biology

Dept. of Chemistry & Chemical Biology
ABB-156
McMaster University
1280 Main St. West.
Hamilton, ON L8S 4M1

Map icon location: ABB-418
Phone icon phone: (905) 525-9140 x 27290
Envelope icon email: pharriso**At_Symbol_Here**mcmaster.ca

McMaster University Brighter World logo

 


From: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU] on behalf of Daniel Kuespert [0000057d3b6cd9b7-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU]
Sent: December 29, 2018 6:38 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Academic freedom?

Ghastly. I get variations on the "academic freedom" and "I am an expert in this research area therefore I am an expert on this research area's safety" arguments all the time.

 

The idea that scholars should have unrestricted "freedom to communicate ideas or facts without being targeted for imprisonment," etc. is ridiculous. Such an over-broad interpretation of academic freedom basically gives carte blanche for faculty members to engage in risky behaviors and subject their students (or even the public) to the same risks. Dr. Thrasher does not have the "academic freedom" to teach his students to dispense LN barehanded, as the caption for the photo states he is doing. That doing so is safe is not a "fact,", but it is an idea-one that he has a positive ethical and legal responsibility not to foster.

 

No one has the right in a civil society to disseminate ideas that are potentially physically injurious to others—if someone gets hurt or killed, the authorities can interpret it as anything from reckless endangerment to depraved-heart murder. Academic freedom is limited by the same factors that limit other freedoms—particularly other people's right to be free from injury or death. Recall the old saying, "your right to swing your fist stops where my nose begins."

 

Daniel Reid Kuespert, PhD, CSP

11101 Wood Elves Way

Columbia, MD 21044

410-992-9709



On Dec 27, 2018, at 11:41 AM, Ralph Stuart <000005bc294e9212-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> wrote:

 

This is an interesting case study for those of us overseeing academic laboratories.

https://www.independentmail.com/story/news/2018/12/21/clemson-university-lab-shuts-down-over-safety-concerns/2268019002/

The article above includes an interesting take on academic freedom. Wikipedia describes academic freedom as
"Academic freedom is the conviction that the freedom of inquiry by faculty members is essential to the mission of the academy as well as the principles of academia, and that scholars should have freedom to teach or communicate ideas or facts (including those that are inconvenient to external political groups or to authorities) without being targeted for repression, job loss, or imprisonment."

The story doesn't indicate that any of those consequences are likely as a result of the University's action. The professor's case that he operates safely would probably be stronger if he wasn't pictured dispensing liquid nitrogen barehanded as part of the story...

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart, CIH, CCHO
rstuartcih**At_Symbol_Here**me.com

---
For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

 

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional membership chair at membership**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.