About This Archive  | DCHAS-L 2017 Index   | DCHAS-L Yearly Index
person wearing a disposable face shield and surgical style mask

Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.

Previous by Date:
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] NY Times Op Ed: A Dangerous Idea: Eliminating the Chemical Safety Board
Date: Monday, July 24, 2017 at 2:38:25 PM
Author: Annesciencemom <000003fb75ba68df-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> 		Next by Date:
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] NY Times Op Ed: A Dangerous Idea: Eliminating the Chemical Safety Board
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 06:39:04 -0400
Author: Monona Rossol

From: Richard Rosera <richardrosera**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] NY Times Op Ed: A Dangerous Idea: Eliminating the Chemical Safety Board
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:47:33 -0400
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: BEBF7C95-CD34-44B7-AE75-93167548F54B**At_Symbol_Here**gmail.com
In-Reply-To <0E84AA29-0CFA-4736-90EF-723B13EF2378**At_Symbol_Here**aol.com>


The funding of the CSB is definitely not a "done deal".  At this point, its funding has been included in the House Budget Committee's proposed appropriations.  If one appreciates that the House Budget Committee Chair is Rodney Freylinghuysen of New Jersey, and that a bipartisan majority of the New Jersey House of Representatives members supported CSB funding, this outcome is not surprising.  However, so far I have not seen any "champion" for the CSB in the Senate.  So at best continued funding of the CSB is still a work in progress.


Mr. Trump may still have the final word on the CSB.  Its five Board members must be proposed by the President, and then confirmed by the Senate for five year terms.  Currently the CSB Board only has four members, and all of their terms will expire in the first half of 2020.  So - even if funded now - without new appointments & confirmations, the CSB could effectively be leaderless by mid-2020.  Then what?

Richard Rosera
Rosearray EHS Services LLC
908-279-4463

On Jul 24, 2017, at 2:38 PM, Annesciencemom <000003fb75ba68df-dmarc-request**At_Symbol_Here**LISTS.PRINCETON.EDU> wrote:

I thought I read previously that CSB was funded?

Sent from my iPhone 


On Jul 24, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG> wrote:

FYI, there is an interesting NY Times Op Ed piece about the Chemical Safety Board at
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/24/opinion/a-dangerous-idea-eliminating-the-chemical-safety-board.html
 

- Ralph

Ralph Stuart
Secretary
Division of Chemical Health and Safety
American Chemical Society




--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas
--- For more information about the DCHAS-L e-mail list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org Follow us on Twitter **At_Symbol_Here**acsdchas

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post


The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.