| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2016 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: [DCHAS-L] ADV: Chemical Safety Workshops - US Midwest - CONFIRMED Date: Monday, May 2, 2016 11:27:54 AM Author: Harry Elston <helston**At_Symbol_Here**MIDWESTCHEMSAFETY.COM> |
Next by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Simple benchmarking scale for safety Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 16:41:20 +0000 Author: "Frazier, Alicia S" |
This is very interesting and similar to DuPont's Bradley curve (http://www.dupont.com/products-and-services/consulting-services-process-technologies/brands/sustainable-solutions/sub-brands/operational-risk-management/uses-and-applications/bradley-curve.html).
Thanks for sharing Dan!
--
James H. Wright, PhD
Chemical Safety Officer
The University of Chicago
Office of Research Safety
5730 S. Ellis Ave, Crerar Library Rm 018
Chicago, IL 60637
Phone: (773)702-5907
jhwright**At_Symbol_Here**uchicago.edu
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu]
On Behalf Of Daniel Crowl
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 9:38 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Simple benchmarking scale for safety
Hi Neal,
You can move up the scale without upper administration support - we did it in the Michigan Tech unit operations lab with a student run safety program and I also did it mostly in my research lab. However, it is a lot easier with administrative
support.
Dan=E2=80=8B
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:01 AM, NEAL LANGERMAN <neal**At_Symbol_Here**chemical-safety.com> wrote:
I totally concur with your assessment. Going further, the prevailing attitude seems to be that 3,4 and 5 are the responsibility of EH&S, not for each
member of the campus community. Changing that attitude through strong leadership by the senior campus officials is necessary to move up the scale. This is the essence of the recent APLU report and the core of the ACS Safety Culture document.
Neal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer.
ACSafety has a new address:
NEAL LANGERMAN, Ph.D.
ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY, Inc.
PO Box 152329
SAN DIEGO CA 92195
011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)
We no longer support FAX.
Please contact me before sending any packages or courier delivery. The address for those items is:
5340 Caminito Cachorro
San Diego CA 92105
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**med.cornell.edu]
On Behalf Of Daniel Crowl
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 7:10 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Simple benchmarking scale for safety
=E2=80=8BWith all these lab incidents there has been a lot of discussion about what to do. One thing that is missing is a simple benchmarking scale to gauge your safety program.
Last July I was at a process safety workshop in Hong Kong and saw a presentation by Hugh Sullivan of ERM - a consulting firm. He presented a scale that works for all safety programs,
including lab safety and process safety. I took the liberty of adding a 0 on the scale because, sadly, I have encountered this many times.
The benchmarking scale is:
0 - no safety program, maybe even disdain for safety.
1 - reacts to accidents only
2 - follows rules and regulations
3 - management systems exist such as hazard analysis, pre-startup reviews, etc.
4 - performance indicators - including leading and lagging
5 - adapting - safety is a core value
Several comments:
a. you need to work your way up thru the scale - you can't jump from 2 to 5
b. many folks think that following all rules and regulations is adequate. Sorry, but that only gets you to a 2.
Dan Crowl
Adjunct Professor, University of Utah
Professor Emeritus, Michigan Tech University
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post