About This Archive  | DCHAS-L 2014 Index   | DCHAS-L Yearly Index
person wearing a disposable face shield and surgical style mask

Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.

Previous by Date:
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report
Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:42:34 AM
Author: "Looney, Bill" <bill.looney**At_Symbol_Here**AECOM.COM> 		Next by Date:
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:41:51 -0400
Author: Monona Rossol

From: "Alnajjar, Mikhail S" <ms.alnajjar**At_Symbol_Here**PNNL.GOV>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:52:54 +0000
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: 67518ED493A5794FB21A7CA33CD03C7A808CC2**At_Symbol_Here**EX10MBOX03.pnnl.gov
In-Reply-To <491BAFF276FF854886DBD3801D4254371AE1E7AE**At_Symbol_Here**USDEN3EXMB008.na.aecomnet.com>


I think it is more than just handling nanomaterials

 

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Looney, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 8:43 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report

 

As is often the case, it’s unfortunate that they didn’t take basic nanomaterial handling precautions before the incident.

 

William C. Looney

Senior Program Manager

Environment

D 414.944.6182  C 262.893.0658

Internal Cisco Extension 2166182

bill.looney**At_Symbol_Here**aecom.com 

 

AECOM

1555 N RiverCenter Drive

Suite 214

Milwaukee, WI  53212

Phone:  414-944-6080

Fax:  414-944-6081

www..aecom.com

 

This communication is intended for the sole use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or subject to copyright. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any communication received in error should be deleted and all copies destroyed.  

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Alnajjar, Mikhail S
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:21 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report

 

Very interesting.  We had similar situation with an administrator who worked in an office located within a laboratory building.  No longer the staff can enter the building without having a rash and face-flushing.  They did all kind of testing and monitoring without finding out the real cause.  Eventually, the staff had to be relocated.

 

Mikhail

 

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Monona Rossol
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 6:03 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report

 

Right on Kay.  And even if she had a skin reaction to nickel, that FEV1 says something dramatic happened.  And she can't even go in the building?  I only see that kind of face-flushing, FEV1-dropping reaction in workers exposed to the major nasties like the isocyanates and certain dyes.   

 

 

Monona Rossol, M.S., M.F.A., Industrial Hygienist

President:  Arts, Crafts & Theater Safety, Inc.

Safety Officer: Local USA829, IATSE

181 Thompson St., #23

New York, NY 10012     212-777-0062

actsnyc**At_Symbol_Here**cs.com   www.artscraftstheatersafety.org


 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rita Kay Calhoun <r..calhoun**At_Symbol_Here**MOREHEADSTATE.EDU>
To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Sent: Tue, May 20, 2014 1:41 pm
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report

        The original report indicated that one of the reactions she had was to her 
earrings.  This suggests that previously she had had no reaction to the nickel 
in the earring posts, so the sensitization does appear to be related to the 
material being in nano form.  
Just a guess.
Kay
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Ralph B. Stuart
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 12:34 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case 
report
 
> Does the report indicate that the exposure was exacerbated the material being 
in the nano form?
 
The report is based on a single case and the fact that the symptoms arose after 
work with Ni nano-particle began; she had previously worked with non-nano Ni. 
For a particular incident, I'm not sure how you would determine whether the nano 
aspect exacerbated the situation. It's more of a suggestive data point report 
than a conclusive study...
 
- Ralph
 
Ralph Stuart CIH
Chemical Hygiene Officer
Department of Environmental Health and Safety Cornell University
 
rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post


The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.