| About This Archive | | DCHAS-L 2014 Index | | DCHAS-L Yearly Index | |
Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.
|
Previous by Date: Subject: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines (8 articles) Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:28:23 AM Author: Secretary ACS DCHAS <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org> |
Next by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:42:34 +0000 Author: "Looney, Bill" |
Very interesting. We had similar situation with an administrator who worked in an office located within a laboratory building. No longer the staff can enter
the building without having a rash and face-flushing. They did all kind of testing and monitoring without finding out the real cause. Eventually, the staff had to be relocated.
Mikhail
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU]
On Behalf Of Monona Rossol
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 6:03 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report
Right on Kay. And even if she had a skin reaction to nickel, that FEV1 says something dramatic happened. And she can't even go in the building? I only see that
kind of face-flushing, FEV1-dropping reaction in workers exposed to the major nasties like the isocyanates and certain dyes.
Monona Rossol, M.S., M.F.A., Industrial Hygienist
President: Arts, Crafts & Theater Safety, Inc.
Safety Officer: Local USA829, IATSE
181 Thompson St., #23
New York, NY 10012 212-777-0062
-----Original Message-----
From: Rita Kay Calhoun <r..calhoun**At_Symbol_Here**MOREHEADSTATE.EDU>
To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Sent: Tue, May 20, 2014 1:41 pm
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report
The original report indicated that one of the reactions she had was to her
earrings. This suggests that previously she had had no reaction to the nickel
in the earring posts, so the sensitization does appear to be related to the
material being in nano form.
Just a guess.
Kay
-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of
Ralph B. Stuart
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 12:34 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case
report
> Does the report indicate that the exposure was exacerbated the material being
in the nano form?
The report is based on a single case and the fact that the symptoms arose after
work with Ni nano-particle began; she had previously worked with non-nano Ni.
For a particular incident, I'm not sure how you would determine whether the nano
aspect exacerbated the situation. It's more of a suggestive data point report
than a conclusive study...
- Ralph
Ralph Stuart CIH
Chemical Hygiene Officer
Department of Environmental Health and Safety Cornell University
rstuart**At_Symbol_Here**cornell.edu
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post