About This Archive  |	DCHAS-L 2013 Index   |	DCHAS-L Yearly Index
Search All Posts:   Advanced Search     Disclaimer

Check out Safety Emporium for your N95, N99, and face shield needs.

Previous by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Flame Resistance & Lab Coats Date: January 28, 2013 12:20:40 PM EST Author: Slawomir Janicki

Next by Date: Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Flame Resistance & Lab Coats Date: January 28, 2013 12:45:22 PM EST Author: Nicholas Waddell

I agree that Nomex is superior to FR. Nomex IIIA meets NFPA 1975, 1506, 70E, and 2112.

Sent from my iPhone

George S. Smith III
Thermo Fisher Scientific

On 2013-01-28, at 9:15 AM, "NEAL LANGERMAN" wrote:

In our industrial plants, the general rule is that FR cotton garments are
replaced every two years My own Nomex coveralls are really beat up but
still provide good flash protection -
Nomex is definitely superior

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Standard confidentiality terms apply

NEAL LANGERMAN, Ph.D.
ADVANCED CHEMICAL SAFETY, Inc.
PO Box 152329
SAN DIEGO CA 92195
011(619) 990-4908 (phone, 24/7)
www.chemical-safety.com

-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of
Robin M. Izzo
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:49 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Flame Resistance & Lab Coats

Russ,

I will look for the literature on this, but to quickly answer about the
treated coats vs. Nomex, the companies that sell the treated coats say that
the fire resistance begins to fail after two years. The Nomex is more
expensive, but the fire resistance does not fade.

I have seen some literature on all but the human toxicity of the treated FR
coats.

Thanks,
Robin

Robin M. Izzo, M.S.
Associate Director, EHS
Princeton University
609-258-6259 (office)

Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
~ Mark Twain

-----Original Message-----
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of
Russell Vernon
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 1:01 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: [DCHAS-L] Flame Resistance & Lab Coats

So the discussion in the UC Lab Safety world now includes flame retardant
lab coats and human/environmental potential consequences.

I would greatly appreciate being pointed toward information that would help
us more intelligently discuss these concerns:

How good are FR coats in a real flammable liquid fire? How does that compare
to non-FR lab coats?
Are the treated cloth lab coats inferior to the "Nomex" type?
Do the modern treated FR coats demonstrate any human toxicity or
environmental adverse effects?

Literature that may help us in answering these kinds of questions is what I
am asking you to help me find.

Sincerely,
-Russ

Russell Vernon, Ph.D.

Director

Environmental Health & Safety

University of California Riverside

900 University Ave

EH&S
Riverside, CA 92521

www.ehs.ucr.edu

russell.vernon**At_Symbol_Here**ucr.edu

direct 951.827.5119

admin 951.827.5528

fax 951.827.5122

after hours emergency contact UCPD 951.827.5222

________________________________________
From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] on behalf of
Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety [secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:50 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google (12 articles)

From: Melissa Charlton-Smith
Subject: RE: [DCHAS-L] Chemical Safety headlines from Google (12 articles)
Date: January 25, 2013 1:33:49 PM EST

Nitric acid is aqueous, so how can it be flammable (in the Tripoli
story)

Possibly someone who KNOWS told the reporter that it's an oxidizer and at
certain concentrations can cause combustion in contact with combustible
materials....and the reporter took the short root to "it's flammable".

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post