From: "Wright, Mike" <mwright**At_Symbol_Here**USW.ORG>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 4 more MSDS and GHS
Date: January 27, 2012 3:34:17 PM EST
Reply-To: DCHAS-L <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>
Message-ID: A <944888566.3140311327691677267.JavaMail.root**At_Symbol_Here**zcs-mbs03.it.mtu.edu>


I just reread my own post. I have no idea why I included the word "inert." In fact, we've had hydrogen fires and explosions in these things.

 

Michael J. Wright

Director of Health, Safety and Environment

United Steelworkers

5 Gateway Center

Pittsburgh, PA 15222

 

Work (412) 562-2580

Cell (412) 370-0105

Fax (412) 562-2584

 

mwright**At_Symbol_Here**usw.org

 

Visit us on the web at www.usw.org

 

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Allen Niemi
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 2:15 PM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 4 more MSDS and GHS

 

Just as an aside, I don't doubt that the annealing furnace was filled with hydrogen but I sure wouldn't call it an inert gas. Flammable or explosive would be a better description. It's used in that type of application to keep the hot metal from oxidizing and even clean up existing oxidation and must be handled with extreme caution.

-----------------------------------------
Allen Niemi, PhD
Director
Occupational Safety and Health Services
Rm 322 Lakeshore Center
Michigan Technological University
Houghton, Michigan 49931
Office: 906-487-2118
Fax: 906-487-3048
anniemi**At_Symbol_Here**mtu.edu



----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Wright" <mwright**At_Symbol_Here**USW.ORG>
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:35:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] 4 more MSDS and GHS


RCF is ubiquitous in industrial plants which use hot processes, and despite the ACGIH TLV, there's no specific OSHA standard. That's because it's almost impossible for OSHA to promulgate a health standard through the incredibly labor-intensive and time-consuming process we have.

 

Instead, RCFs and all other miscellaneous particulates without specific standards are considered "nuisance dusts," with a PEL of 5 mg/m3 (respirable). As in - cancer is a hell of a nuisance.

 

We try to educate people about it, and we try to put a stop to the worst work practices, but it's an uphill battle. I once saw a company use an RCF gasket to seal a box-annealing furnace, which is a large cylindrical box lofted by a crane and set down over stacked steel coils. The box is filled with an inert gas - usually hydrogen - and heated. The process affects the grain structure of the steel. When the process was complete the hydrogen was evacuated; the box was lifted; and the now-friable RCF gasketing was blown out with compressed air, exposing everyone in the shop.  

 

Michael J. Wright

Director of Health, Safety and Environment

United Steelworkers

5 Gateway Center

Pittsburgh, PA 15222

 

Work (412) 562-2580

Cell     (412) 370-0105

Fax     (412) 562-2584

 

mwright**At_Symbol_Here**usw.org

 

Visit us on the web at www.usw.org

 

 

Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.