Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:44:29 -0500
Reply-To: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
Sender: DCHAS-L Discussion List <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU>
From: Carol Lentz <lentzcw**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Latex degradation, low humidity, Chinese drywall?
In-Reply-To: <535834.78732.qm**At_Symbol_Here**web82507.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Not necessarily, I noticed over the years that latex gloves exposed to only fluorescent lights in labs without windows degraded faster than gloves kept in lab drawers. But I only observed it, I didn't do any testing to verify it. On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:14 PM, AL CLANCY wrote: > Is the lighting-latex degradation connection about UV? > > --- On *Thu, 11/19/09, Carol Lentz * wrote: > > > From: Carol Lentz > Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Latex degradation, low humidity, Chinese drywall? > > To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU > Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 11:18 AM > > > What about the quality of the lighting? It might explain the hasty > degradation of latex, and the headaches. Low humidity (<40%) for MY nose > could be the culprit for stuffy noses. Perhaps it isn't just one thing? > > Carol Lentz > Michigan State University > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Laurence Doemeny > > wrote: > >> Have you checked to ensure that all traps in sinks and floor drains are >> not dry? >> >> >> >> *From:* DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu] >> *On Behalf Of *Debbie M. Decker >> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 18, 2009 11:35 AM >> *To:* DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU >> *Subject:* [DCHAS-L] Latex degradation, low humidity, Chinese drywall? >> > > > Please excuse the cross-postings: > > > > I=92m working with a group that works in a secured, containment facility. > The supply air is one pass, the exhaust is HEPA filtered and air change > rates are in the 10-15 ACH. Rubber bands, latex gloves, the gloves on a > glove box, rubber stoppers, etc. degrade very quickly in this building - a > matter of months. This causes consternation among my building occupants - > =93if latex degrades so quickly, what is this building doing to me?=94 > > > > I have done the following: datalogged temperature, %RH, CO and CO2 twice , > at different times of year, for a week. First set showed extremely low > humidity - below 20%rh - all other measurements within customary. Se cond > round showed %rh in a more normal range - 35-40%rh. Magnetic fields we re at > or below background. No radioactivity was detected. The building doesn =92t > have any weird smells, evidence of mold or water intrusion. The mechanic al > system is working as designed, filters in place and without high pressure > drop, coils clean, etc., according to my building engineers. > > > > People complain of headaches and stuffy noses, general malaise after > working in the building for some period of time. Someone has suggested > Chinese drywall might be a culprit but I don=92t know as it quite fits. > > > > Whaddya think? All ideas welcome, at this point. > > > > Thanks, > > Debbie > > -------------------- > > > > Debbie M. Decker, Campus Chemical Safety Officer > Environmental Health and Safety > University of California, Davis > 1 Shields Ave. > Davis, CA 95616 > (530)754-7964/(530)752-4527 (FAX) > dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**ucdavis.edu > Co-Conspirator to Make the World A > Better Place -- Visit www.HeroicStories.comand join the conspiracy > > > > > > >

Not necessarily, I noticed over the years that latex gloves exposed to only fluorescent lights in labs without windows degraded faster than gloves kep t in lab drawers. But I only observed it, I didn't do any testing to ve rify it.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:14 PM, AL CLANCY <al.clancy**At_Symbol_Here**sbcgl obal.net> wrote:
Is the lighting-latex degradation connection about UV?
--- On Thu, 11/19/09, Carol Lentz <lentzcw**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM> wrote:

From: Carol Lentz <lentzcw**At_Symbol_Here**GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: [DCHA S-L] Latex degradation, low humidity, Chinese drywall? Date: Thursday, November 19, 200 9, 11:18 AM


What about the quality of the lighting? It might explain the hasty deg radation of latex, and the headaches. Low humidity (<40%) for MY nose co uld be the culprit for stuffy noses. Perhaps it isn't just one thing?
=A0
Carol Lentz
Michigan State University


=A0
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Laurence Doeme ny <ldoemeny**At_Symbol_Here**cox.n et> wrote:

Have you checked to e nsure that all traps in sinks and floor drains are not dry?

=A0

From:< span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"> DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Debbie M. Decker
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 11:35 AM
To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [ DCHAS-L] Latex degradation, low humidity, Chinese drywall?

=A0

Please excuse the cross-postings:

=A0

I=92m working with a group that works in a secured, containment facility.=A0 The supply air is one pass, the exhaust is HEPA fi ltered and air change rates are in the 10-15 ACH.=A0 Rubber bands, latex gl oves, the gloves on a glove box, rubber stoppers, etc. degrade very quickly in this building - a matter of months.=A0 This causes consternation amon g my building occupants - =93if latex degrades so quickly, what is this b uilding doing to me?=94

=A0

I have done the following: =A0datalogged temperature , %RH, CO and CO2 twice, at different times of year, for a week.=A0 First s et showed extremely low humidity - below 20%rh - all other measurements within customary.=A0 Second round showed %rh in a more normal range - 35 -40%rh.=A0 Magnetic fields were at or below background.=A0 No radioactivity was detected.=A0 The building doesn=92t have any weird smells, evidence of mold or water intrusion.=A0 The mechanical system is working as designed, filters in place and without high pressure drop, coils clean, etc., accordi ng to my building engineers.

=A0

People complain of headaches and stuffy noses, gener al malaise after working in the building for some period of time.=A0 Someon e has suggested Chinese drywall might be a culprit but I don=92t know as it quite fits.

=A0

Whaddya think?=A0 All ideas welcome, at this point.

=A0

Thanks,

Debbie

--------------------

=A0

Debbie M. Decker, Ca mpus Chemical Safety Officer
Environmental Health and Safety
Universi ty of California, Davis
1 Shields Ave.
Davis, CA=A0 95616
(530)754 -7964/(530)752-4527 (FAX)
dmdecker**At_Symbol_Here**ucdavis.edu
Co-Cons pirator to Make the World A
Better Place -- Visit www.HeroicStories.c om and join the conspiracy

=A0

=A0



Previous post   |  Top of Page   |   Next post



The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.
The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.